EPYC 9334 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9334

32 Cores64 Thrd210 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 Cores104 Thrd300 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9334

32 / 64

65,568

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 / 104

68,385

+4.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 210W instead of 300W, a 90W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 68,385).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅+4.3% higher PassMark.
✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $2,391 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 420.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9334 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 210W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than EPYC 9334?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9334 is ahead with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N pulls ahead with 4.3% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8571N also has the bigger cache pool with 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.3% better PassMark, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8571N comes in $2,391 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,990 MSRP, and it still gives you 4.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9334 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 420.6% better value on MSRP (114.2 vs 21.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8571N makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 52 cores / 104 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 4.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	52 / 104+63%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+13%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+134%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	65,568	68,385+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	60,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8571N). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9334) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the EPYC 9334 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9334 was priced at $2990, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N came in at $599. On launch pricing ($2990 vs $599), Xeon Platinum 8571N was $2391 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 135.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP	$2990	$599-80%
Performance per Dollar	21.9	114.2+421%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9334 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8571N on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.