EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w9-3475X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9334

32 Cores64 Thrd210 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w9-3475X

36 Cores72 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w9-3475X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9334

32 / 64

65,568

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w9-3475X

36 / 72

65,077

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w9-3475X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w9-3475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).
✅Costs $749 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 300W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3475X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon w9-3475X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (65,077 vs 65,568).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($3,739 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
❌42.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 210W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9334 better than Xeon w9-3475X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w9-3475X is ahead with a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9334 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. EPYC 9334 also has the bigger cache pool with 55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9334 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9334 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9334 comes in $749 cheaper on MSRP at $2,990 MSRP versus $3,739 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon w9-3475X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.0% better value on MSRP (21.9 vs 17.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3475X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w9-3475X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

Xeon w9-3475X

The Xeon w9-3475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,077 points. Launch price was $3,739.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w9-3475X offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon w9-3475X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3475X — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Xeon w9-3475X's 65,077 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon w9-3475X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	36 / 72+13%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+23%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+55%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	65,568	65,077
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,814
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	44,869

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3475X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9334) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3475X) — the EPYC 9334 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and W790 (Xeon w9-3475X).

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon w9-3475X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w9-3475X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9334) vs true (Xeon w9-3475X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon w9-3475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon w9-3475X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9334 was priced at $2990, while the Xeon w9-3475X came in at $3739. On launch pricing ($2990 vs $3739), EPYC 9334 was $749 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3475X — making the EPYC 9334 the 23% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9334	Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP	$2990-20%	$3739
Performance per Dollar	21.9+26%	17.4
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9334 on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3475X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.