EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w7-3555

AMD

EPYC 9334

32 Cores64 Thrd210 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon w7-3555

28 Cores56 Thrd325 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w7-3555 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w7-3555 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w7-3555: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

  • +70.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 75 MB).
  • Draws 210W instead of 325W, a 115W reduction.
  • 14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3555 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 67,754).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $2,749 MSRP).

Xeon w7-3555

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $241 less on MSRP ($2,749 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
  • Delivers 12.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($2,749 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (75 MB vs 128 MB).
  • 54.8% higher power demand at 325W vs 210W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3555 better than EPYC 9334?
Yes. Xeon w7-3555 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-3555 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3555 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w7-3555 is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-3555 comes in $241 cheaper on MSRP at $2,749 MSRP versus $2,990 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 12.4% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 21.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w7-3555 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9334 vs Xeon w7-3555 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

Intel

Xeon w7-3555

The Xeon w7-3555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 325 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 67,754 points. Launch price was $2,339.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9334 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w7-3555 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3555 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3555 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w7-3555 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Xeon w7-3555's 67,754 — a 3.3% lead for the Xeon w7-3555. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3555.

FeatureEPYC 9334Xeon w7-3555
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+14%
28 / 56
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+71%
75 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
65,568
67,754+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,120
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3555 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3555). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9334) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3555) — the EPYC 9334 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and W790 (Xeon w7-3555).

FeatureEPYC 9334Xeon w7-3555
Socket
SP5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB+50%
4096 GB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+14%
112
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3555 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9334) vs true (Xeon w7-3555). Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon w7-3555 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

FeatureEPYC 9334Xeon w7-3555
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9334 was priced at $2990, while the Xeon w7-3555 came in at $2749. On launch pricing ($2990 vs $2749), Xeon w7-3555 was $241 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3555 — making the Xeon w7-3555 the 11.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9334Xeon w7-3555
MSRP
$2990
$2749-8%
Performance per Dollar
21.9
24.6+12%
Release Date
2022
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.