EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9334

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9175F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9334

32 Cores64 Thrd210 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9334 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9175F

16 / 32

65,894

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9334

32 / 64

65,568

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9334 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
❌52.4% higher power demand at 320W vs 210W.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,266 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 320W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 65,894).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 512 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9175F better than EPYC 9334?

Yes. EPYC 9175F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 24.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9175F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 24.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9175F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9175F is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9334 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9175F comes in 42.3% more expensive on MSRP at $4,256 MSRP versus $2,990 MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9334 is also 41.6% better value on MSRP (21.9 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9175F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9334 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9334 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9334 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the EPYC 9334's 65,568 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+28%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+56%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+300%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	65,894	65,568

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus 4800 on the EPYC 9334 — the EPYC 9175F supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and SP5 (EPYC 9334).

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+33%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9175F was priced at $4256, while the EPYC 9334 came in at $2990. On launch pricing ($4256 vs $2990), EPYC 9334 was $1266 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9334 — making the EPYC 9334 the 34.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
MSRP	$4256	$2990-30%
Performance per Dollar	15.5	21.9+41%
Release Date	2024	2022

Search EPYC 9175F on Amazon

Search EPYC 9334 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.