EPYC 9175F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9175F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (65,894 vs 67,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,827 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 917.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 512 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than EPYC 9175F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9175F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 2.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 512 MB (total)+700% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 65,894 | 67,561+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,016 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 23,596 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 6400 memory speed. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9175F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9175F was priced at $4256, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX came in at $429. On launch pricing ($4256 vs $429), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX was $3827 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 164.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4256 | $429-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5 | 157.5+916% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9175F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
