EPYC 9175F vs Xeon w7-3555

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9175F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3555

28 Cores56 Thrd325 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon w7-3555 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9175F

16 / 32

65,894

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-3555

28 / 56

67,754

+2.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon w7-3555 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon w7-3555: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (65,894 vs 67,754).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $2,749 MSRP).

Xeon w7-3555

2024

Why buy it

✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,507 less on MSRP ($2,749 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($2,749 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3555 better than EPYC 9175F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9175F is ahead with a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3555 pulls ahead with 2.8% better PassMark. EPYC 9175F also has the bigger cache pool with 582.7% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 75 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3555 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3555 is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-3555 comes in $1,507 cheaper on MSRP at $2,749 MSRP versus $4,256 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9175F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 59.2% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9175F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 512 MB L3 cache instead of 75 MB. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon w7-3555 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

Xeon w7-3555

The Xeon w7-3555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 325 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 67,754 points. Launch price was $2,339.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-3555 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon w7-3555 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3555 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-3555 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the Xeon w7-3555's 67,754 — a 2.8% lead for the Xeon w7-3555. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3555.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon w7-3555
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+4%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+56%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+583%	75 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	65,894	67,754+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,120

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3555 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3555 — the EPYC 9175F supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3555). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9175F) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3555) — the EPYC 9175F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and W790 (Xeon w7-3555).

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon w7-3555
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+33%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3555 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9175F) vs true (Xeon w7-3555). Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; Xeon w7-3555 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon w7-3555
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9175F was priced at $4256, while the Xeon w7-3555 came in at $2749. On launch pricing ($4256 vs $2749), Xeon w7-3555 was $1507 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3555 — making the Xeon w7-3555 the 45.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon w7-3555
MSRP	$4256	$2749-35%
Performance per Dollar	15.5	24.6+59%
Release Date	2024	2024

Search EPYC 9175F on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3555 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.