EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y
EPYC 9175F
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3,703) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,995) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+4%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3,703) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,995) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9175F and Xeon Platinum 8352Y
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 38.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9175F is built on the Turin (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 4.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+47% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+91% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 512 MB (total)+967% | 48 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | — |
| PassMark | 65,894 | 68,643+4% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — the EPYC 9175F supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9175F) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the EPYC 9175F offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+100% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9175F launched at $4256 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y debuted at $3995.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4256 | $3995-6% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3703 | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9175F and Xeon Platinum 8352Y
