EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9175F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9175F

16 / 32

65,894

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 / 64

68,643

+4.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (65,894 vs 68,643).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
❌56.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 205W.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

✅+4.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $261 less on MSRP ($3,995 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 205W instead of 320W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9175F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8352Y better than EPYC 9175F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9175F is ahead with a 34.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y pulls ahead with 4.2% better PassMark. EPYC 9175F also has the bigger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8352Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.2% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8352Y is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8352Y comes in $261 cheaper on MSRP at $3,995 MSRP versus $4,256 MSRP, and it still gives you 4.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9175F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 34.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11.0% better value on MSRP (17.2 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9175F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 512 MB L3 cache instead of 48 MB. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 38.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9175F is built on the Turin (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 4.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+47%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+91%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+967%	48 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-60%	10 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	—
PassMark	65,894	68,643+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — the EPYC 9175F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9175F) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the EPYC 9175F offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Socket	SP5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+100%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9175F was priced at $4256, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y came in at $3995. On launch pricing ($4256 vs $3995), Xeon Platinum 8352Y was $261 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the Xeon Platinum 8352Y the 10.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP	$4256	$3995-6%
Performance per Dollar	15.5	17.2+11%
Release Date	2024	2021

Search EPYC 9175F on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8352Y on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.