EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9175F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 Cores104 Thrd300 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9175F

16 / 32

65,894

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 / 104

68,385

+3.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8571N FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8571N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 300 MB).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (65,894 vs 68,385).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅+3.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $3,657 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 637.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 300W instead of 320W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (300 MB vs 512 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than EPYC 9175F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9175F is ahead with a 28.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N pulls ahead with 3.8% better PassMark. EPYC 9175F also has the bigger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 300 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8571N comes in $3,657 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $4,256 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9175F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 28.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 637.4% better value on MSRP (114.2 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9175F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 70.7% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 300 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 22.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 3.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	52 / 104+225%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+25%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+75%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+71%	300 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	65,894	68,385+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	60,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the EPYC 9175F supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8571N). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9175F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the EPYC 9175F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+33%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9175F was priced at $4256, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N came in at $599. On launch pricing ($4256 vs $599), Xeon Platinum 8571N was $3657 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 152.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP	$4256	$599-86%
Performance per Dollar	15.5	114.2+637%
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 9175F on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8571N on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.