EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
EPYC 9175F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) | ✅ More affordable ($225) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1564%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) | ✅ More affordable ($225) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9175F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 10.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+11% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+11% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 512 MB (total)+300% | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 65,894 | 66,614+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 45,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the EPYC 9175F supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+159900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 2048 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9175F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9175F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9175F launched at $4256 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. At current prices ($3703 vs $225), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $3478 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 17.8 pts/$ vs 296.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 177.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4256 | $2399-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3703 | $225-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.8 | 296.1+1563% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9175F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
