Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Xeon w9-3475X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2019
Threadripper family
·
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Xeon w9-3475X

36 Cores72 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Xeon w9-3475X Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32 / 64
62,946
0.0%
brand logoRyzen AI 9 HX 370
brand logoRyzen AI Max 390
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9955HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Xeon w9-3475X
36 / 72
65,077
+3.4%
brand logoCore Ultra 5 135H
brand logoCore i9-9980XE
brand logoCore i7-13850HX
brand logoCore i7-13790F
brand logoCore Ultra 7 255HX
brand logoCore i9-13900KF
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
brand logoXeon w9-3495X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Xeon w9-3475X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low270 FPS
medium222 FPS
high183 FPS
ultra131 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low316 FPS
medium306 FPS
high246 FPS
ultra207 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low806 FPS
medium681 FPS
high528 FPS
ultra457 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low384 FPS
medium332 FPS
high270 FPS
ultra236 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low1025 FPS
medium927 FPS
high862 FPS
ultra765 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low1025 FPS
medium1086 FPS
high1020 FPS
ultra875 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low1325 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high1073 FPS
ultra875 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low1304 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high1002 FPS
ultra866 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low326 FPS
medium247 FPS
high225 FPS
ultra202 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low326 FPS
medium244 FPS
high212 FPS
ultra189 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low345 FPS
medium306 FPS
high244 FPS
ultra207 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low275 FPS
medium246 FPS
high200 FPS
ultra168 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low367 FPS
medium327 FPS
high284 FPS
ultra242 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low331 FPS
medium301 FPS
high278 FPS
ultra236 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low286 FPS
medium266 FPS
high224 FPS
ultra210 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3475X
low290 FPS
medium266 FPS
high226 FPS
ultra210 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Xeon w9-3475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +25.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,739 vs 44,869).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
  • ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3475X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w9-3475X

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅+226.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • ✅Costs $752 less on MSRP ($3,739 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 24.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($3,739 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
  • ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
  • ✅75% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3475X better than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is ahead with a 25.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X pulls ahead with 226.6% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper 3970X also has the bigger cache pool with 55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X is the stronger fit. You are getting 226.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w9-3475X is the better buy right now. Xeon w9-3475X comes in $752 cheaper on MSRP at $3,739 MSRP versus $4,491 MSRP, and it still gives you 226.6% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 25.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 24.2% better value on MSRP (17.4 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w9-3475X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 36 cores / 72 threads instead of 32/64, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Xeon w9-3475X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Intel

Xeon w9-3475X

The Xeon w9-3475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,077 points. Launch price was $3,739.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w9-3475X offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon w9-3475X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3475X — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X scores 62,946 against the Xeon w9-3475X's 65,077 — a 3.3% lead for the Xeon w9-3475X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,664 vs 1,814, a 8.6% lead for the Xeon w9-3475X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,739 vs 44,869 (106.2% advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3475X.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 3970XXeon w9-3475X
Cores / Threads
32 / 64
36 / 72+13%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
4.8 GHz+7%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+68%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB+55%
82.5 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+25500%
2 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
62,946
65,077+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
44,510
—
Geekbench 6 Single
1,664
1,814+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi
13,739
44,869+227%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3475X — the Xeon w9-3475X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3475X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3475X). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3475X) — the Xeon w9-3475X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3475X).

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 3970XXeon w9-3475X
Socket
TR4
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
4
8+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
64
112+75%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w9-3475X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE; Xeon w9-3475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 3970XXeon w9-3475X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
true
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X was priced at $4491, while the Xeon w9-3475X came in at $3739. On launch pricing ($4491 vs $3739), Xeon w9-3475X was $752 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3475X — making the Xeon w9-3475X the 21.6% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 3970XXeon w9-3475X
MSRP
$4491
$3739-17%
Performance per Dollar
14.0
17.4+24%
Release Date
2019
2023
Search Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on AmazonSearch Xeon w9-3475X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.