
EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

EPYC 9254

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9254
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+318%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9254 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9254 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — a 8.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 9254 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9254 scores 64,344 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X's 62,946 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 9254. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,233 vs 1,664, a 29.2% lead for the EPYC 9254 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,023 vs 13,739 (27% advantage for the EPYC 9254). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.15 GHz | 4.5 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 64,344+2% | 62,946 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 44,510 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,233+34% | 1,664 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,023+31% | 13,739 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9254 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — the EPYC 9254 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9254) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9254) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) — the EPYC 9254 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9254) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X).
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+2300% | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9254 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9254) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9254 launched at $3761 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X debuted at $4491. At current prices ($1099 vs $4491), the EPYC 9254 is $3392 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9254 delivers 58.5 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — making the EPYC 9254 the 122.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3761-16% | $4491 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1099-76% | $4491 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.5+318% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













