EPYC 9254
VS
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

AMD

EPYC 9254

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.15 GHz2022
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9254

#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
115%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
115%
#375
Xeon D-2766NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212
115%
#376
Xeon Gold 6442Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
114%
#377
Xeon 6740P
MSRP: $4650|Avg: $4650
114%
#378
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
MSRP: $7999|Avg: $7999
113%
#379
Xeon W-3345
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $3319
113%
#380
Xeon Gold 6526Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
111%
#382
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP: $3995|Avg: N/A
110%
#383
EPYC 7551P
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $329
106%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
MSRP: $7349|Avg: $7999
106%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
105%
#386
Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP: $3739|Avg: $3930
102%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
100%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
100%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
99%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
99%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
99%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
99%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
98%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
98%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
98%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
97%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
97%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
96%
#400
EPYC 7713P
MSRP: $5010|Avg: $2443
95%
#401
Xeon W-2145
MSRP: $1113|Avg: $145
95%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
94%
#403
Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP: $3157|Avg: $2836
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
233%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
231%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
216%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
203%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
200%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
199%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
198%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
192%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
188%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
186%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
183%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
170%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
158%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
146%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
141%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
100%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
55%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The EPYC 9254 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in both compute-intensive tasks (2.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightEPYC 9254Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($1,099)
⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The EPYC 9254 leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 76% cheaper ($1,099 vs $4,491) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightEPYC 9254Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+318%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($1,099)
⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9254 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

AMD

EPYC 9254

The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9254 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — a 8.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 9254 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9254 scores 64,344 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X's 62,946 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 9254. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,233 vs 1,664, a 29.2% lead for the EPYC 9254 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,023 vs 13,739 (27% advantage for the EPYC 9254). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.

FeatureEPYC 9254Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock
4.15 GHz
4.5 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)
128 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
64,344+2%
62,946
Cinebench R23 Multi
44,510
Geekbench 6 Single
2,233+34%
1,664
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,023+31%
13,739
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9254 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — the EPYC 9254 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9254) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9254) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) — the EPYC 9254 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9254) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X).

FeatureEPYC 9254Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Socket
SP5
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+25%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB+2300%
256 GB
RAM Channels
12+200%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+100%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9254 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9254) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE.

FeatureEPYC 9254Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Enterprise Server
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9254 launched at $3761 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X debuted at $4491. At current prices ($1099 vs $4491), the EPYC 9254 is $3392 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9254 delivers 58.5 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — making the EPYC 9254 the 122.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9254Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP
$3761-16%
$4491
Avg Price (30d)
$1099-76%
$4491
Performance per Dollar
58.5+318%
14.0
Release Date
2022
2019