Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w7-2595X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9254

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.15 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Xeon w7-2595X

26 Cores52 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w7-2595X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9254
24 / 48
64,344
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 7 7700X
brand logoRyzen 7 8840HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Xeon w7-2595X
26 / 52
66,049
+2.6%
brand logoCore i9-11900
brand logoCore i9-7980XE
brand logoCore Ultra 9 285T
brand logoCore i7-13790F
brand logoCore Ultra 7 255HX
brand logoCore Ultra 9 285HX
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
brand logoXeon w9-3495X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w7-2595X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9254
low171 FPS
medium142 FPS
high123 FPS
ultra96 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low339 FPS
medium312 FPS
high253 FPS
ultra214 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9254
low603 FPS
medium529 FPS
high429 FPS
ultra375 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low683 FPS
medium580 FPS
high459 FPS
ultra406 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9254
low716 FPS
medium608 FPS
high552 FPS
ultra486 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low1025 FPS
medium1219 FPS
high1113 FPS
ultra875 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9254
low868 FPS
medium793 FPS
high684 FPS
ultra605 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low1124 FPS
medium1007 FPS
high881 FPS
ultra783 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9254
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9254
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9254
low302 FPS
medium233 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra191 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low304 FPS
medium226 FPS
high204 FPS
ultra184 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9254
low256 FPS
medium226 FPS
high178 FPS
ultra146 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low280 FPS
medium246 FPS
high198 FPS
ultra167 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9254
low324 FPS
medium290 FPS
high269 FPS
ultra232 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low325 FPS
medium283 FPS
high260 FPS
ultra220 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9254
low277 FPS
medium258 FPS
high217 FPS
ultra205 FPS
1080P
Xeon w7-2595X
low284 FPS
medium263 FPS
high221 FPS
ultra206 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w7-2595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9254

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅+162.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 49 MB).
  • ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
  • ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,023 vs 21,758).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($3,761 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).

Xeon w7-2595X

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $1,722 less on MSRP ($2,039 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 89.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 128 MB).
  • ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-2595X better than EPYC 9254?
Yes. Xeon w7-2595X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 20.7% better Geekbench multi-core, 2.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-2595X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-2595X is the stronger fit. You are getting 20.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 26 cores and 52 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w7-2595X is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-2595X comes in $1,722 cheaper on MSRP at $2,039 MSRP versus $3,761 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 89.3% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 17.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w7-2595X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 26 cores / 52 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w7-2595X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9254

The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Intel

Xeon w7-2595X

The Xeon w7-2595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 48.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 66,049 points. Launch price was $2,039.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9254 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w7-2595X offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon w7-2595X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2595X — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2595X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 9254 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9254 scores 64,344 against the Xeon w7-2595X's 66,049 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon w7-2595X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,233 vs 2,436, a 8.7% lead for the Xeon w7-2595X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,023 vs 21,758 (18.8% advantage for the Xeon w7-2595X). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254 vs 48.75 MB on the Xeon w7-2595X.

FeatureEPYC 9254Xeon w7-2595X
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
26 / 52+8%
Boost Clock
4.15 GHz
4.8 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+4%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+163%
48.75 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
64,344
66,049+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
—
48,442
Geekbench 6 Single
2,233
2,436+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,023
21,758+21%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9254 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9254) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9254) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2595X) — the EPYC 9254 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9254) and W790 (Xeon w7-2595X).

FeatureEPYC 9254Xeon w7-2595X
Socket
SP5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB+200%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
12+200%
4
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+100%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-2595X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9254) vs true (Xeon w7-2595X). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon w7-2595X rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.

FeatureEPYC 9254Xeon w7-2595X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Enterprise Server
—
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9254 was priced at $3761, while the Xeon w7-2595X came in at $2039. On launch pricing ($3761 vs $2039), Xeon w7-2595X was $1722 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9254 delivers 17.1 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2595X — making the Xeon w7-2595X the 61.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9254Xeon w7-2595X
MSRP
$3761
$2039-46%
Performance per Dollar
17.1
32.4+89%
Release Date
2022
2024
Search EPYC 9254 on AmazonSearch Xeon w7-2595X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.