EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w9-3475X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9254

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.15 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w9-3475X

36 Cores72 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w9-3475X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9254

24 / 48

64,344

0.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w9-3475X

36 / 72

65,077

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w9-3475X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w9-3475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9254

2022

Why buy it

✅+55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3475X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,023 vs 44,869).
❌
0.6% HIGHER MSRP
$3,761 MSRPvs$3,739 MSRP

Xeon w9-3475X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $22 less on MSRP ($3,739 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 128 MB).
❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3475X better than EPYC 9254?

Yes. Xeon w9-3475X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 149% better Geekbench multi-core, 1.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3475X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X is the stronger fit. You are getting 149% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3475X is the better buy right now. Xeon w9-3475X comes in $22 cheaper on MSRP at $3,739 MSRP versus $3,761 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1.7% better value on MSRP (17.4 vs 17.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3475X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 36 cores / 72 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon w9-3475X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9254

The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Xeon w9-3475X

The Xeon w9-3475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,077 points. Launch price was $3,739.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9254 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3475X offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon w9-3475X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3475X — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9254 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9254 scores 64,344 against the Xeon w9-3475X's 65,077 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon w9-3475X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,233 vs 1,814, a 20.7% lead for the EPYC 9254 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,023 vs 44,869 (85.4% advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254 vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	EPYC 9254	Xeon w9-3475X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	36 / 72+50%
Boost Clock	4.15 GHz	4.8 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+32%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+55%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	64,344	65,077+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,233+23%	1,814
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,023	44,869+149%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9254 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9254) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3475X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9254) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3475X) — the EPYC 9254 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9254) and W790 (Xeon w9-3475X).

Feature	EPYC 9254	Xeon w9-3475X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w9-3475X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9254) vs true (Xeon w9-3475X). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon w9-3475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9254	Xeon w9-3475X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Enterprise Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9254 was priced at $3761, while the Xeon w9-3475X came in at $3739. On launch pricing ($3761 vs $3739), Xeon w9-3475X was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9254 delivers 17.1 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3475X — making the Xeon w9-3475X the 1.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9254	Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP	$3761	$3739
Performance per Dollar	17.1	17.4+2%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9254 on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3475X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.