EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9254
EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9254
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9254
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+229%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9175F and EPYC 9254
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9254 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9254 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9254 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the EPYC 9254's 64,344 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+20% | 4.15 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 512 MB (total)+300% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 65,894+2% | 64,344 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,233 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,023 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 — the EPYC 9175F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and SP5 (EPYC 9254).
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+127900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144 GB+157286300% |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9175F) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9254). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9175F launched at $4256 MSRP, while the EPYC 9254 debuted at $3761. At current prices ($3703 vs $1099), the EPYC 9254 is $2604 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 17.8 pts/$ vs 58.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9254 — making the EPYC 9254 the 106.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4256 | $3761-12% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3703 | $1099-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.8 | 58.5+229% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9175F and EPYC 9254
