EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9254

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9175F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9254

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.15 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9254 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9175F

16 / 32

65,894

+2.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9254

24 / 48

64,344

0.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9254 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9254: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 320W vs 200W.

EPYC 9254

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $495 less on MSRP ($3,761 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 10.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.1 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($3,761 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 320W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (64,344 vs 65,894).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 512 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9175F better than EPYC 9254?

Yes. EPYC 9175F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9175F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9175F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9175F is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9254 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9175F comes in 13.2% more expensive on MSRP at $4,256 MSRP versus $3,761 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9254 is also 10.5% better value on MSRP (17.1 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9175F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 9254 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

EPYC 9254

The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9254 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9254 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9254 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the EPYC 9254's 64,344 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9254
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+20%	4.15 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+45%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+300%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	65,894+2%	64,344
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,233
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,023

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 — the EPYC 9175F supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and SP5 (EPYC 9254).

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9254
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+33%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	6144 GB+50%
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9175F) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9254). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9254
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Enterprise Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9175F was priced at $4256, while the EPYC 9254 came in at $3761. On launch pricing ($4256 vs $3761), EPYC 9254 was $495 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 17.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9254 — making the EPYC 9254 the 10% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9254
MSRP	$4256	$3761-12%
Performance per Dollar	15.5	17.1+10%
Release Date	2024	2022

Search EPYC 9175F on Amazon

Search EPYC 9254 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.