Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon 6710E
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Xeon 6710E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6710E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($368) | ✅ More affordable ($344) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sierra Forest (2024) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($368) | ✅ More affordable ($344) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Xeon 6710E
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Xeon 6710E
The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6710E offers 64 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E — a 27% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6710E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 62,261 against the Xeon 6710E's 61,404 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,260 vs 1,225, a 2.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,211 vs 10,400 (83.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+31% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+33% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 62,261+1% | 61,404 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 42,986 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,260+3% | 1,225 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,211+142% | 10,400 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6710E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon 6710E — the Xeon 6710E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6710E supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6710E) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) and C741 (Xeon 6710E).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6710E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6710E). Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375; Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Efficiency Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX launched at $1337 MSRP, while the Xeon 6710E debuted at $1565. At current prices ($368 vs $344), the Xeon 6710E is $24 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX delivers 169.2 pts/$ vs 178.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6710E — making the Xeon 6710E the 5.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1337-15% | $1565 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $368 | $344-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 169.2 | 178.5+5% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Xeon 6710E
