EPYC 7702P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7702P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+2.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,088 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.6 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,261 vs 63,692).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX better than EPYC 7702P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7702P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7702P
The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — a 22.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX's 62,261 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 7702P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 4.2 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 63,692+2% | 62,261 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 42,986 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,211 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7702P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7702P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7702P was priced at $4425, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX came in at $1337. On launch pricing ($4425 vs $1337), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX was $3088 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702P delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX the 105.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7702P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4425 | $1337-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4 | 46.6+224% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7702P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
