
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Xeon Gold 5520+
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon Gold 5520+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon Gold 5520+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon Gold 5520+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.6 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5520+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $254 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (25,000 vs 25,211).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX better than Xeon Gold 5520+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon Gold 5520+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.

Xeon Gold 5520+
The Xeon Gold 5520+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,227 points. Launch price was $1,640.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5520+ — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 62,261 against the Xeon Gold 5520+'s 61,227 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,260 vs 1,600, a 23.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 5520+ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,211 vs 25,000 (0.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5520+.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+14% | 28 / 56 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+5% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+59% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+144% | 52.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 62,261+2% | 61,227 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 42,986 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,260 | 1,600+27% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,211 | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Gold 5520+ — the Xeon Gold 5520+ supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5520+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5520+) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5520+).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 5520+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5520+). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5520+ targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375; Xeon Gold 5520+ rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX was priced at $1337, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ came in at $1083. On launch pricing ($1337 vs $1083), Xeon Gold 5520+ was $254 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX delivers 46.6 pts/$ vs 56.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5520+ — making the Xeon Gold 5520+ the 19.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1337 | $1083-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.6 | 56.5+21% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














