Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Xeon Platinum 8380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $673 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.6 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (25,211 vs 40,000).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021Why buy it
- ✅+58.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8380 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Xeon Platinum 8380
The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 62,261 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8380. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,260 vs 1,300, a 3.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8380 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,211 vs 40,000 (45.4% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 40 / 80+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+24% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+52% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+113% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 62,261 | 62,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 42,986 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,260 | 1,300+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,211 | 40,000+59% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 6144 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8380 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8380). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Datacenter |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX was priced at $1337, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 came in at $2010. On launch pricing ($1337 vs $2010), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX was $673 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX delivers 46.6 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX the 40.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1337-33% | $2010 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.6+50% | 31.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Xeon Platinum 8380
