Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon w7-3465X
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Xeon w7-3465X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-3465X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($368) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($468) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+26%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($368) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($468) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Xeon w7-3465X
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Xeon w7-3465X
The Xeon w7-3465X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,663 points. Launch price was $2,889.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w7-3465X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3465X — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3465X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 62,261 against the Xeon w7-3465X's 62,663 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,260 vs 1,959, a 43.4% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,211 vs 16,351 (42.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+14% | 28 / 56 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+40% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+71% | 75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 62,261 | 62,663 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 42,986 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,260 | 1,959+55% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,211+54% | 16,351 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3465X — the Xeon w7-3465X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3465X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3465X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3465X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w7-3465X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375; Xeon w7-3465X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX launched at $1337 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3465X debuted at $2889. At current prices ($368 vs $468), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is $100 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX delivers 169.2 pts/$ vs 133.9 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3465X — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX the 23.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1337-54% | $2889 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $368-21% | $468 |
| Performance per Dollar | 169.2+26% | 133.9 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Xeon w7-3465X
