Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Xeon w7-3465X
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon w7-3465X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon w7-3465X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon w7-3465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+54.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 75 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,552 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 114.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.6 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,260 vs 1,959).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3465X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon w7-3465X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+55.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,351 vs 25,211).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (75 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($2,889 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX better than Xeon w7-3465X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon w7-3465X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Xeon w7-3465X
The Xeon w7-3465X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,663 points. Launch price was $2,889.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w7-3465X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3465X — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3465X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 62,261 against the Xeon w7-3465X's 62,663 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,260 vs 1,959, a 43.4% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,211 vs 16,351 (42.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+14% | 28 / 56 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+40% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+71% | 75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 62,261 | 62,663 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 42,986 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,260 | 1,959+55% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,211+54% | 16,351 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3465X — the Xeon w7-3465X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3465X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3465X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3465X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w7-3465X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375; Xeon w7-3465X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX was priced at $1337, while the Xeon w7-3465X came in at $2889. On launch pricing ($1337 vs $2889), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX was $1552 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX delivers 46.6 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3465X — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX the 72.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1337-54% | $2889 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.6+115% | 21.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Xeon w7-3465X
