Xeon 6730P vs EPYC 9384X
Xeon 6730P
EPYC 9384X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6730P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9384X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6730P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3,726) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa-X (2023) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6730P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+15%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3,726) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6730P and EPYC 9384X
Xeon 6730P
The Xeon 6730P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 74,113 points. Launch price was $3,726.
EPYC 9384X
The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon 6730P and EPYC 9384X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6730P versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X — a 2.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9384X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon 6730P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the EPYC 9384X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6730P scores 74,113 against the EPYC 9384X's 72,121 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon 6730P. L3 cache: 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6730P vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | Xeon 6730P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 288 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 74,113+3% | 72,121 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6730P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9384X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6730P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9384X — the Xeon 6730P supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6730P) vs 12 (EPYC 9384X). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon 6730P) vs 128 (EPYC 9384X) — the EPYC 9384X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6730P) and SP5 (EPYC 9384X).
| Feature | Xeon 6730P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+33% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 128+60% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6730P) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X). Direct competitor: Xeon 6730P rivals EPYC 9354; EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Xeon 6730P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, TDX | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6730P launched at $3726 MSRP, while the EPYC 9384X debuted at $5529. At current prices ($3726 vs $4157), the Xeon 6730P is $431 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6730P delivers 19.9 pts/$ vs 17.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9384X — making the Xeon 6730P the 13.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6730P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3726-33% | $5529 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3726-10% | $4157 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.9+15% | 17.3 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6730P and EPYC 9384X
