Xeon 6741P vs Xeon w9-3595X

CPU

GPU

Xeon 6741P

48 Cores96 Thrd300 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w9-3595X

60 Cores120 Thrd385 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6741P vs Xeon w9-3595X Performance Spectrum

Xeon 6741P

48 / 96

100,660

+3.2%

97,534

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6741P vs Xeon w9-3595X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6741P vs Xeon w9-3595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6741P

2025

Why buy it

✅+3.2% higher PassMark.
✅+156% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 113 MB).
✅Costs $1,468 less on MSRP ($4,421 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.8 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 300W instead of 385W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w9-3595X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (97,534 vs 100,660).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
❌28.3% higher power demand at 385W vs 300W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6741P better than Xeon w9-3595X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w9-3595X is ahead with a 17.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6741P pulls ahead with 3.2% better PassMark. Xeon 6741P also has the bigger cache pool with 156% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 113 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6741P is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.2% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 156% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 113 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6741P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6741P comes in $1,468 cheaper on MSRP at $4,421 MSRP versus $5,889 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon w9-3595X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 37.5% better value on MSRP (22.8 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6741P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 156% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 113 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 60/120. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Xeon 6741P vs Xeon w9-3595X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6741P

The Xeon 6741P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 100,660 points. Launch price was $4,421.

Xeon w9-3595X

The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6741P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6741P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon 6741P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6741P scores 100,660 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 3.2% lead for the Xeon 6741P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,195 vs 2,300, a 32.6% lead for the Xeon 6741P that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6741P vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.

Feature	Xeon 6741P	Xeon w9-3595X
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	60 / 120+25%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.8 GHz+26%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	288 MB (total)+156%	112.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-57%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	100,660+3%	97,534
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	130,000
Geekbench 6 Single	3,195+39%	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,118

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6741P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6741P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3595X — the Xeon 6741P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 TB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 136 (Xeon 6741P) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the Xeon 6741P offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Xeon 6741P	Xeon w9-3595X
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+33%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4 TB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	136+21%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6741P) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: Xeon 6741P targets Data Center, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon 6741P rivals EPYC 9555; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

Feature	Xeon 6741P	Xeon w9-3595X
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT	true
Target Use	Data Center	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6741P was priced at $4421, while the Xeon w9-3595X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($4421 vs $5889), Xeon 6741P was $1468 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6741P delivers 22.8 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Xeon 6741P the 31.6% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6741P	Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP	$4421-25%	$5889
Performance per Dollar	22.8+37%	16.6
Release Date	2025	2024

Search Xeon 6741P on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3595X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.