EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6741P

EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6741P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9654P

96 / 192

116,324

+15.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Xeon 6741P

48 / 96

100,660

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6741P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6741P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9654P

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 288 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($10,625 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 360W vs 300W.

Xeon 6741P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,204 less on MSRP ($4,421 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
✅Delivers 108.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.8 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
✅Draws 300W instead of 360W, a 60W reduction.
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9654P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (100,660 vs 116,324).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (288 MB vs 384 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9654P better than Xeon 6741P?

Yes. EPYC 9654P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 15.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9654P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9654P is the stronger fit. You are getting 15.6% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 288 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9654P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6741P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9654P comes in 140.3% more expensive on MSRP at $10,625 MSRP versus $4,421 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6741P is also 108.0% better value on MSRP (22.8 vs 10.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6741P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6741P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9654P

The EPYC 9654P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 116,324 points. Launch price was $10,625.

Xeon 6741P

The Xeon 6741P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 100,660 points. Launch price was $4,421.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9654P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Xeon 6741P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9654P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6741P — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6741P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9654P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6741P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9654P scores 116,324 against the Xeon 6741P's 100,660 — a 14.4% lead for the EPYC 9654P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,025 vs 3,195, a 44.8% lead for the Xeon 6741P that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654P vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6741P.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	Xeon 6741P
Cores / Threads	96 / 192+100%	48 / 96
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+33%	288 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	116,324+16%	100,660
Geekbench 6 Single	2,025	3,195+58%
Geekbench 6 Multi	23,214	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9654P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6741P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9654P versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6741P — the Xeon 6741P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9654P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9654P) vs 8 (Xeon 6741P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9654P) vs 136 (Xeon 6741P) — the Xeon 6741P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	Xeon 6741P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	136+6%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9654P) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6741P). Primary use case: EPYC 9654P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon 6741P targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9654P rivals Xeon 8490H; Xeon 6741P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	Xeon 6741P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Data Center

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9654P was priced at $10625, while the Xeon 6741P came in at $4421. On launch pricing ($10625 vs $4421), Xeon 6741P was $6204 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9654P delivers 10.9 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6741P — making the Xeon 6741P the 70.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	Xeon 6741P
MSRP	$10625	$4421-58%
Performance per Dollar	10.9	22.8+109%
Release Date	2022	2025

Search EPYC 9654P on Amazon

Search Xeon 6741P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.