EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6781P

EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6781P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9654P

96 / 192

116,324

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Xeon 6781P

80 / 160

117,946

+1.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6781P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6781P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9654P

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (116,324 vs 117,946).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($10,625 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).

Xeon 6781P

2025

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,665 less on MSRP ($8,960 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.2 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($8,960 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
✅Draws 350W instead of 360W, a 10W reduction.
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9654P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6781P better than EPYC 9654P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9654P is ahead with a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6781P pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6781P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 80 cores and 160 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6781P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6781P comes in $1,665 cheaper on MSRP at $8,960 MSRP versus $10,625 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9654P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 20.2% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 10.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6781P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 80 cores / 160 threads instead of 96/192. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9654P vs Xeon 6781P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9654P

The EPYC 9654P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 116,324 points. Launch price was $10,625.

Xeon 6781P

The Xeon 6781P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 80 cores and 160 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 336 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 117,946 points. Launch price was $8,960.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9654P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Xeon 6781P offers 80 cores / 160 threads — the EPYC 9654P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6781P — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6781P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9654P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6781P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9654P scores 116,324 against the Xeon 6781P's 117,946 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon 6781P. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654P vs 336 MB (total) on the Xeon 6781P.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	Xeon 6781P
Cores / Threads	96 / 192+20%	80 / 160
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+14%	336 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	116,324	117,946+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,025	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	23,214	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9654P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6781P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9654P versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6781P — the Xeon 6781P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9654P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9654P) vs 8 (Xeon 6781P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9654P) vs 136 (Xeon 6781P) — the Xeon 6781P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	Xeon 6781P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	136+6%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9654P) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6781P). Primary use case: EPYC 9654P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon 6781P targets Data Center / Cloud Scale. Direct competitor: EPYC 9654P rivals Xeon 8490H; Xeon 6781P rivals EPYC 9655.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	Xeon 6781P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Data Center / Cloud Scale

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9654P was priced at $10625, while the Xeon 6781P came in at $8960. On launch pricing ($10625 vs $8960), Xeon 6781P was $1665 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9654P delivers 10.9 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6781P — making the Xeon 6781P the 18.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	Xeon 6781P
MSRP	$10625	$8960-16%
Performance per Dollar	10.9	13.2+21%
Release Date	2022	2025

Search EPYC 9654P on Amazon

Search Xeon 6781P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.