EPYC 9654P vs EPYC 9745

EPYC 9654P vs EPYC 9745 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9654P

96 / 192

116,324

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

EPYC 9745

128 / 256

130,698

+12.4%

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9654P vs EPYC 9745 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9654P vs EPYC 9745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9654P

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Costs $1,516 less on MSRP ($10,625 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (116,324 vs 130,698).

EPYC 9745

2024

Why buy it

✅+12.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9654P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
❌
14.3% HIGHER MSRP
$12,141 MSRPvs$10,625 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9745 better than EPYC 9654P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9654P is ahead with a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9745 pulls ahead with 12.4% better PassMark. EPYC 9654P also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9745 is the stronger fit. You are getting 12.4% better PassMark, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9745 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9654P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9745 comes in 14.3% more expensive on MSRP at $12,141 MSRP versus $10,625 MSRP, and it still gives you 12.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9654P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9654P is also 1.7% better value on MSRP (10.9 vs 10.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9745 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 128 cores / 256 threads instead of 96/192. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9654P vs EPYC 9745 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9654P

The EPYC 9654P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 116,324 points. Launch price was $10,625.

EPYC 9745

The EPYC 9745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 130,698 points. Launch price was $12,141.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9654P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the EPYC 9745 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9745 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9745 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9654P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 9745 uses Turin (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9654P scores 116,324 against the EPYC 9745's 130,698 — a 11.6% lead for the EPYC 9745. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654P vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9745.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	EPYC 9745
Cores / Threads	96 / 192	128 / 256+33%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+50%	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	116,324	130,698+12%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,025	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	23,214	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9654P versus DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9745 — the EPYC 9745 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9654P) and SP5 (EPYC 9745).

Feature	EPYC 9654P	EPYC 9745
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6000+25%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9654P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9745 targets Data Center / High Density. Direct competitor: EPYC 9654P rivals Xeon 8490H; EPYC 9745 rivals Xeon 6980P.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	EPYC 9745
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Data Center / High Density

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9654P was priced at $10625, while the EPYC 9745 came in at $12141. On launch pricing ($10625 vs $12141), EPYC 9654P was $1516 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9654P delivers 10.9 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9745 — making the EPYC 9654P the 1.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9654P	EPYC 9745
MSRP	$10625-12%	$12141
Performance per Dollar	10.9	10.8
Release Date	2022	2024

Search EPYC 9654P on Amazon

Search EPYC 9745 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.