
Xeon D-1718T

Xeon E5-2690
Xeon D-1718T vs Xeon E5-2690 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon D-1718T vs Xeon E5-2690 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon D-1718T vs Xeon E5-2690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon D-1718T
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,755 less on MSRP ($302 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 574.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.0 vs 4.7 PassMark/$ ($302 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 46W instead of 135W, a 89W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2690 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,674 vs 9,764).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 20 MB).
Xeon E5-2690
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 32.0 PassMark/$ ($2,057 MSRP vs $302 MSRP).
- ❌193.5% higher power demand at 135W vs 46W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2690 better than Xeon D-1718T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1718T vs Xeon E5-2690 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1718T
The Xeon D-1718T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,674 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2690
The Xeon E5-2690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,764 points. Launch price was $397.
Processing Power
The Xeon D-1718T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2690 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1718T versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2690 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-2690 is built on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1718T scores 9,674 against the Xeon E5-2690's 9,764 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2690. L3 cache: 10 MB on the Xeon D-1718T vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2690.
| Feature | Xeon D-1718T | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB | 20480 kB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | — | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 9,674 | 9,764 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon D-1718T uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-1718T versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2690 — the Xeon D-1718T supports 83.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2690 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon D-1718T) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2690). PCIe lanes: 16 (Xeon D-1718T) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2690) — the Xeon E5-2690 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Xeon D-1718T) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2690).
| Feature | Xeon D-1718T | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2227 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933+83% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 384 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-1718T) / not specified (Xeon E5-2690). Primary use case: Xeon D-1718T targets Server/Edge.
| Feature | Xeon D-1718T | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server/Edge | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon D-1718T was priced at $302, while the Xeon E5-2690 came in at $2057. On launch pricing ($302 vs $2057), Xeon D-1718T was $1755 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon D-1718T delivers 32.0 pts/$ vs 4.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2690 — making the Xeon D-1718T the 148.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon D-1718T | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $302-85% | $2057 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0+581% | 4.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













