
Core i7-11390H

Xeon D-1718T
Core i7-11390H vs Xeon D-1718T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-11390H vs Xeon D-1718T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-11390H vs Xeon D-1718T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-11390H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 46W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon D-1718T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon D-1718T
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11390H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,674 vs 9,798).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $302 MSRP, while Core i7-11390H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 46W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-11390H better than Xeon D-1718T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-11390H vs Xeon D-1718T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11390H
The Core i7-11390H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,798 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1718T
The Xeon D-1718T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,674 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-11390H and Xeon D-1718T share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-11390H versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1718T — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-11390H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-11390H is built on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-11390H scores 9,798 against the Xeon D-1718T's 9,674 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-11390H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,948 vs 900, a 73.6% lead for the Core i7-11390H that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11390H vs 10 MB on the Xeon D-1718T.
| Feature | Core i7-11390H | Xeon D-1718T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+43% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+12% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+20% | 10 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) | — |
| PassMark | 9,798+1% | 9,674 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,948+116% | 900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-11390H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1718T uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11390H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-1718T — the Core i7-11390H supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-1718T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-11390H) vs 16 (Xeon D-1718T) — the Core i7-11390H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM570,QC570,WM590 (Core i7-11390H) and SoC (Xeon D-1718T).
| Feature | Core i7-11390H | Xeon D-1718T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+9% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11390H) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-1718T). The Core i7-11390H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon D-1718T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11390H targets Thin & Light Gaming Laptop, Xeon D-1718T targets Server/Edge. Direct competitor: Core i7-11390H rivals Ryzen 7 5800U.
| Feature | Core i7-11390H | Xeon D-1718T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Thin & Light Gaming Laptop | Server/Edge |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













