Core i7-11390H vs Xeon E5-2648L V3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11390H vs Xeon E5-2648L V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11390H vs Xeon E5-2648L V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11390H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 75W, a 47W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon E5-2648L V3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,798 vs 9,847).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2648L V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon E5-2648L V3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11390H across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌167.9% higher power demand at 75W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11390H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11390H better than Xeon E5-2648L V3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2648L V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-11390H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2648L V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-11390H still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-11390H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11390H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-11390H vs Xeon E5-2648L V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11390H

The Core i7-11390H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,798 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2648L V3

The Xeon E5-2648L V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,847 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11390H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2648L V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2648L V3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-11390H versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L V3 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-11390H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-11390H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2648L V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11390H scores 9,798 against the Xeon E5-2648L V3's 9,847 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L V3. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11390H vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2648L V3.

Feature	Core i7-11390H	Xeon E5-2648L V3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+100%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+61%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	9,798	9,847
Geekbench 6 Single	1,948	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11390H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2648L V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-11390H	Xeon E5-2648L V3
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11390H) / not specified (Xeon E5-2648L V3). The Core i7-11390H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon E5-2648L V3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11390H targets Thin & Light Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11390H rivals Ryzen 7 5800U.

Feature	Core i7-11390H	Xeon E5-2648L V3
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Iris Xe Graphics 96EU	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Thin & Light Gaming Laptop	—