Xeon D-1718T vs Xeon E5-2650 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1718T vs Xeon E5-2650 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1718T vs Xeon E5-2650 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1718T

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 46W instead of 95W, a 49W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,674 vs 9,795).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $302 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2650 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2650 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌106.5% higher power demand at 95W vs 46W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2650 v2 better than Xeon D-1718T?

Yes. Xeon E5-2650 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2650 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2650 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2650 v2 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-2650 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $302 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon D-1718T only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 18.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1718T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1718T vs Xeon E5-2650 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1718T

The Xeon D-1718T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,674 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2650 v2

The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,795 points. Launch price was $650.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1718T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1718T versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v2 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1718T (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1718T scores 9,674 against the Xeon E5-2650 v2's 9,795 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v2. L3 cache: 10 MB on the Xeon D-1718T vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v2.

Feature	Xeon D-1718T	Xeon E5-2650 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+3%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB	20 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	—	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	9,674	9,795+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1718T uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-1718T versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2650 v2 — the Xeon D-1718T supports 57.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon D-1718T) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Xeon D-1718T) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v2) — the Xeon E5-2650 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Xeon D-1718T) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2650 v2).

Feature	Xeon D-1718T	Xeon E5-2650 v2
Socket	FCBGA2227	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+57%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	768 GB+200%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	40+150%