
Xeon E-2146G

Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E-2146G vs Xeon E5-2650 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E-2146G vs Xeon E5-2650 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E-2146G vs Xeon E5-2650 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E-2146G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 105W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P630, while Xeon E5-2650 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2650 v4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,240 vs 13,290).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,166 MSRP, while Xeon E-2146G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌31.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 80W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E-2146G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon E-2146G.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2146G better than Xeon E5-2650 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2146G vs Xeon E5-2650 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2146G
The Xeon E-2146G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,240 points. Launch price was $317.

Xeon E5-2650 v4
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,290 points. Launch price was $1,166.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2146G packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2146G versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — a 43.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2146G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E-2146G uses the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2146G scores 13,240 against the Xeon E5-2650 v4's 13,290 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2146G vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v4.
| Feature | Xeon E-2146G | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+55% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+59% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 13,240 | 13,290 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,557 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,385 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2146G uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon E-2146G versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — the Xeon E-2146G supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon E-2146G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v4). PCIe lanes: 16 (Xeon E-2146G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v4) — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C242,C246 (Xeon E-2146G) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2650 v4).
| Feature | Xeon E-2146G | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+11% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1536 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon E5-2650 v4 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon E-2146G) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650 v4). The Xeon E-2146G includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P630), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 v4 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E-2146G | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics P630 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













