Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E-2146G

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 3 210

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E-2146G

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2018

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E-2146G Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 210

4 / 8

13,209

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E-2146G

6 / 12

13,240

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E-2146G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E-2146G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 210

2025

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 28W instead of 80W, a 52W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2146G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2146G, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E-2146G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon E-2146G.

Xeon E-2146G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 14.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 210.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (6,385 vs 6,500).
❌185.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 210 moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 210 better than Xeon E-2146G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2146G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 210 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 210 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 210 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 210 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon E-2146G is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (133.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 210 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E-2146G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E-2146G

The Xeon E-2146G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,240 points. Launch price was $317.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2146G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E-2146G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2146G — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 210 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E-2146G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 13,209 against the Xeon E-2146G's 13,240 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E-2146G. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 1,557, a 38.5% lead for the Ryzen 3 210 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,500 vs 6,385 (1.8% advantage for the Ryzen 3 210). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2146G.

Feature	Ryzen 3 210	Xeon E-2146G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+4%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.5 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
PassMark	13,209	13,240
Cinebench R23 Multi	515	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,300+48%	1,557
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,500+2%	6,385

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 210 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2146G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 3 210 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon E-2146G — the Ryzen 3 210 supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 3 210 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 14 (Ryzen 3 210) vs 16 (Xeon E-2146G) — the Xeon E-2146G offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 3 210) and C242,C246 (Xeon E-2146G).

Feature	Ryzen 3 210	Xeon E-2146G
Socket	FP7	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+110%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	14	16+14%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 3 210 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210) vs Yes (Xeon E-2146G). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 740M (Ryzen 3 210) and UHD Graphics P630 (Xeon E-2146G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.