Ryzen 3 210
VS
Xeon E5-2675 V3

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2675 V3

16 Cores32 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 210

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
107%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
90%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2675 V3

#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
113%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
113%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
113%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
113%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
112%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
111%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
109%
#516
Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP: $4672|Avg: $4672
108%
#517
Xeon Gold 6150
MSRP: $3358|Avg: $196
108%
#518
Xeon E5-1680 v3
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $200
105%
#519
Xeon E5-2690 v3
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $85
105%
#520
Xeon 6780E
MSRP: $11350|Avg: $8513
104%
#521
Xeon E5-2697A v4
MSRP: $2891|Avg: $121
102%
#522
Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP: $2214|Avg: $378
102%
#523
Xeon Gold 6138T
MSRP: $2742|Avg: $400
101%
#524
Xeon E5-2675 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $100
100%
#524
Xeon E5-2676 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $36
100%
#524
Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP: $6619|Avg: $185
100%
#527
Xeon Platinum 8592+
MSRP: $11600|Avg: $11600
99%
#528
Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749
93%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
87%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
86%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
84%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
83%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
83%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
82%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
78%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
77%
#537
Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2363
52%
#538
Xeon Platinum 8280M
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $6223
51%
#539
Xeon Platinum 8280
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2940
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 210 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2675 V3
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($99)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2675 V3 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR4-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2675 V3
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($99)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 210 and Xeon E5-2675 V3

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2675 V3

The Xeon E5-2675 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,180 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2675 V3 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2675 V3 — a 68.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 210 (base: 3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 13,209 against the Xeon E5-2675 V3's 13,180 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 210. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210 vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2675 V3.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2675 V3
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
16 / 32+300%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+104%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+67%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
40 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
4 nm-82%
22 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
13,209
13,180
Cinebench R23 Multi
515
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 210 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2675 V3
Socket
FP7
LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210) / not specified (Xeon E5-2675 V3). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2675 V3
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 3 210 launched at $99 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 debuted at $1800. At current prices ($99 vs $100), the Ryzen 3 210 is $1 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 210 delivers 133.4 pts/$ vs 131.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2675 V3 — making the Ryzen 3 210 the 1.2% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2675 V3
MSRP
$99-95%
$1800
Avg Price (30d)
$99-1%
$100
Performance per Dollar
133.4+1%
131.8
Release Date
2025
2014