Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2676 V3

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2676 V3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 210

4 / 8

13,209

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2676 V3

12 / 24

13,178

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2676 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2676 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 210

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,800 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1722.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 133.4 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,800 MSRP).
✅Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2676 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon E5-2676 V3

2015

Why buy it

✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,178 vs 13,209).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 133.4 PassMark/$ ($1,800 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 210 moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 210 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 210 better than Xeon E5-2676 V3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2676 V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 210 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 210 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 210 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 210 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 210 comes in $1,701 cheaper on MSRP at $99 MSRP versus $1,800 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1722.5% better value on MSRP (133.4 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 210 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2015), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3, more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2676 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2676 V3

The Xeon E5-2676 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,178 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2676 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2676 V3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2676 V3 — a 44.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 210 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2676 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 13,209 against the Xeon E5-2676 V3's 13,178 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 210. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2676 V3.

Feature	Ryzen 3 210	Xeon E5-2676 V3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+57%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+25%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	4 nm-82%	22 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	13,209	13,178
Cinebench R23 Multi	515	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 210 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2676 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 210	Xeon E5-2676 V3
Socket	FP7	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	14	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210) / not specified (Xeon E5-2676 V3). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon E5-2676 V3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.

Feature	Ryzen 3 210	Xeon E5-2676 V3
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon 740M	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 210 was priced at $99, while the Xeon E5-2676 V3 came in at $1800. On launch pricing ($99 vs $1800), Ryzen 3 210 was $1701 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 210 delivers 133.4 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2676 V3 — making the Ryzen 3 210 the 179.2% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 210	Xeon E5-2676 V3
MSRP	$99-95%	$1800
Performance per Dollar	133.4+1727%	7.3
Release Date	2025	2015

Search Ryzen 3 210 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2676 V3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.