Ryzen 3 210
VS
Xeon E5-2650 v4

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2650 v4

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v4

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 210

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
107%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
90%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650 v4

#456
EPYC 9575F
MSRP: $11791|Avg: $9238
110%
#457
EPYC 7642
MSRP: $4775|Avg: $850
109%
#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
109%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
108%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
106%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
106%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
106%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
105%
#464
Xeon W-3375
MSRP: $4951|Avg: $6000
105%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
104%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
103%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
103%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
101%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
100%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
100%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
99%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
97%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
96%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
95%
#476
EPYC 9745
MSRP: $12141|Avg: $10588
94%
#477
EPYC 7J13
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $150
94%
#478
EPYC 7702
MSRP: $6450|Avg: $2035
94%
#479
EPYC 7763
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $1513
94%
#480
EPYC 9734
MSRP: $9600|Avg: $6598
93%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
93%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
92%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
92%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
91%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
90%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 210 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2650 v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($45)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-EP (2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2650 v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+121%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 210 and Xeon E5-2650 v4

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v4

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,290 points. Launch price was $1,166.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — a 47.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 210 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 13,209 against the Xeon E5-2650 v4's 13,290 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v4.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2650 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+62%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+36%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark
13,209
13,290
Cinebench R23 Multi
515
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 210 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 3 210 versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — the Ryzen 3 210 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 3 210) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v4). PCIe lanes: 14 (Ryzen 3 210) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v4) — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 26 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 3 210) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2650 v4).

FeatureRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2650 v4
Socket
FP7
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+25%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
1536 GB+500%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
40+186%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650 v4). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop, Xeon E5-2650 v4 targets Server.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2650 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Laptop
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 3 210 launched at $99 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 debuted at $1166. At current prices ($99 vs $45), the Xeon E5-2650 v4 is $54 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 210 delivers 133.4 pts/$ vs 295.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — making the Xeon E5-2650 v4 the 75.5% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP
$99-92%
$1166
Avg Price (30d)
$99
$45-55%
Performance per Dollar
133.4
295.3+121%
Release Date
2025
2016