Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2690 v2

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2690 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 210

4 / 8

13,209

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2690 v2

10 / 20

13,377

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2690 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2690 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 210

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Xeon E5-2690 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2690 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,209 vs 13,377).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2690 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2690 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 3 210 moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 210 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2690 v2 better than Ryzen 3 210?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2690 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 210 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2690 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2690 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2690 v2 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-2690 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 210 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 210 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 210 vs Xeon E5-2690 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2690 v2

The Xeon E5-2690 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,377 points. Launch price was $2,697.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2690 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 v2 — a 26.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 210 (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 13,209 against the Xeon E5-2690 v2's 13,377 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2690 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2690 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 3 210	Xeon E5-2690 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+31%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+213%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-82%	22 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	13,209	13,377+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	515	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 210 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 210	Xeon E5-2690 v2
Socket	FP7	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	14	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210) / not specified (Xeon E5-2690 v2). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon E5-2690 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.