Ryzen 3 210
VS
Ryzen Embedded V2516

Ryzen 3 210 vs Ryzen Embedded V2516

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2516

6 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.95 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 210

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
107%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
90%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V2516

#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
111%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
110%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
106%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
106%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
106%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
105%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
104%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
104%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
101%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
101%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
101%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
101%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
101%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
101%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
100%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
100%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
99%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
99%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
98%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
97%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
97%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
97%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
96%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
93%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
93%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
88%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
88%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
87%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
84%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 3 210 leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen Embedded V2516 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 3 210Ryzen Embedded V2516
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($99)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Renoir (2020−2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Ryzen 3 210 leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 67% cheaper ($99 vs $300) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightRyzen 3 210Ryzen Embedded V2516
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+200%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($99)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 210 and Ryzen Embedded V2516

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2516

The Ryzen Embedded V2516 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,329 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V2516 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2516 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 210 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 13,209 against the Ryzen Embedded V2516's 13,329 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2516. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Ryzen Embedded V2516
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+19%
3.95 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+43%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark
13,209
13,329
Cinebench R23 Multi
515
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 210 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Ryzen Embedded V2516
Socket
FP7
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2516). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Ryzen Embedded V2516
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 3 210 launched at $99 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 debuted at $300. At current prices ($99 vs $300), the Ryzen 3 210 is $201 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 210 delivers 133.4 pts/$ vs 44.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2516 — making the Ryzen 3 210 the 100.1% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP
$99-67%
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$99-67%
$300
Performance per Dollar
133.4+200%
44.4
Release Date
2025
2020