
Xeon E-2286M
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2680 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E-2286M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon E5-2680 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2286M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,864 vs 15,080).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Xeon E-2286M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Xeon E-2286M
2019Xeon E5-2680 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2286M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,864 vs 15,080).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Xeon E-2286M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2286M better than Xeon E5-2680 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2286M | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2286M | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E-2286M | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 268 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E-2286M | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2286M and Xeon E5-2680 v3

Xeon E-2286M
Xeon E-2286M
The Xeon E-2286M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 15,080 points. Launch price was $623.

Xeon E5-2680 v3
Xeon E5-2680 v3
The Xeon E5-2680 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,864 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2286M packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2286M versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 — a 41% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2286M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon E-2286M uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2286M scores 15,080 against the Xeon E5-2680 v3's 14,864 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E-2286M. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2286M vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v3.
| Feature | Xeon E-2286M | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+52% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 15,080+1% | 14,864 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2286M uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2286M | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2286M) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2680 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2680 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E-2286M | Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













