Xeon E-2314 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2314 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2314 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2314

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,734 vs 7,779).
❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Xeon E-2314 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2314 better than Xeon E5-2620 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2620 v3 is ahead with a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2314 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2620 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2314 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2314 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2620 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2314 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $417 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2620 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2620 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2314 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2314 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2314

The Xeon E-2314 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,779 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,734 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2314 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2314 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — a 33.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2314 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E-2314 uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2314 scores 7,779 against the Xeon E5-2620 v3's 7,734 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E-2314. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2314 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v3.

Feature	Xeon E-2314	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+41%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+17%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	7,779	7,734

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2314 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E-2314	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40