Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E-2314

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E-2314 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6348

12 / 12

7,850

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E-2314

4 / 4

7,779

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E-2314 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E-2314: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6348

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $575 MSRP, while Xeon E-2314 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.

Xeon E-2314

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6348 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,779 vs 7,850).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6348 better than Xeon E-2314?

Yes. Opteron 6348 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6348 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6348 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6348 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6348 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $575 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2314 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E-2314 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6348

The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E-2314

The Xeon E-2314 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,779 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6348 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2314 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2314 — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2314 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Opteron 6348 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E-2314 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6348 scores 7,850 against the Xeon E-2314's 7,779 — a 0.9% lead for the Opteron 6348. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon E-2314
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+200%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.5 GHz+32%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	12 MB	512K (per core)+4167%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	7,850	7,779

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6348 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E-2314 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.