Xeon E-2314 vs Xeon X7550
Xeon E-2314
Xeon X7550
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E-2314 is positioned at rank 383 and the Xeon X7550 is on rank 985, so the Xeon E-2314 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E-2314
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X7550
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E-2314 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,400) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-E (2021) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E-2314 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2314 and Xeon X7550
Xeon E-2314
The Xeon E-2314 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,779 points. Launch price was $800.
Xeon X7550
The Xeon X7550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 7,873 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2314 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X7550 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon X7550 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2314 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon X7550 — a 60.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2314 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E-2314 is built on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E-2314 scores 7,779 against the Xeon X7550's 7,873 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon X7550. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2314 vs 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X7550.
| Feature | Xeon E-2314 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+88% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 18 MB L3 Cache+125% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake-E (2021) | — |
| PassMark | 7,779 | 7,873+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2314 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon X7550 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2314 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1567 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2314) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X7550). Primary use case: Xeon X7550 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7550 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon E-2314 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E-2314 and Xeon X7550
