Xeon E-2336 vs Xeon W-11865MLE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2336 vs Xeon W-11865MLE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2336 vs Xeon W-11865MLE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2336

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.

Xeon W-11865MLE

2021

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2336 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,917 vs 16,136).
❌Launch MSRP is still $467 MSRP, while Xeon E-2336 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2336 better than Xeon W-11865MLE?

Yes. Xeon E-2336 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2336 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2336 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2336 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E-2336 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $467 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-11865MLE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-11865MLE is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon E-2336 vs Xeon W-11865MLE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2336

The Xeon E-2336 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,136 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-11865MLE

The Xeon W-11865MLE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 August 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,917 points. Launch price was $467.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2336 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-11865MLE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-11865MLE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2336 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-11865MLE — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2336 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Xeon E-2336 uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2336 scores 16,136 against the Xeon W-11865MLE's 15,917 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E-2336. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2336 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11865MLE.

Feature	Xeon E-2336	Xeon W-11865MLE
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+7%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+93%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+40860%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark	16,136+1%	15,917

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2336 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.