Core i5-1240P vs Xeon E-2336

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1240P vs Xeon E-2336 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1240P vs Xeon E-2336: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1240P

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics, while Xeon E-2336 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2336 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Xeon E-2336 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2336

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,136 vs 16,224).
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-1240P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1240P better than Xeon E-2336?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2336 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1240P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1240P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1240P is the better buy right now. Core i5-1240P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $309 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E-2336 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1240P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-1240P vs Xeon E-2336 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1240P

The Core i5-1240P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,224 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2336

The Xeon E-2336 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,136 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1240P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2336 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-1240P has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1240P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2336 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2336 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-1240P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E-2336 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1240P scores 16,224 against the Xeon E-2336's 16,136 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-1240P. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-1240P	Xeon E-2336
Cores / Threads	12 / 16+100%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.9 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-P (2022)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	16,224	16,136
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,268	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,102	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,577	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1240P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2336 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1240P	Xeon E-2336
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1240P) / not specified (Xeon E-2336). The Core i5-1240P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics), while the Xeon E-2336 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1240P targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-1240P rivals Ryzen 5 6600U.