
Core i5-1240P

Xeon D-2733NT
Core i5-1240P vs Xeon D-2733NT Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-1240P vs Xeon D-2733NT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-1240P vs Xeon D-2733NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-1240P
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 80W, a 52W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics, while Xeon D-2733NT needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Xeon D-2733NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2733NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1240P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,206 vs 16,224).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Core i5-1240P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1240P better than Xeon D-2733NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1240P vs Xeon D-2733NT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1240P
The Core i5-1240P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,224 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2733NT
The Xeon D-2733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,206 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1240P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2733NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-1240P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1240P versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-2733NT — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-1240P (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-1240P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1240P scores 16,224 against the Xeon D-2733NT's 16,206 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-1240P. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1240P vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2733NT.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+38% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 16,224 | 16,206 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,268 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,102 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,577 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1240P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1240P) / not specified (Xeon D-2733NT). The Core i5-1240P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics), while the Xeon D-2733NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1240P targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-1240P rivals Ryzen 5 6600U.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













