Core i5-1240P vs Xeon E5-4650 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1240P vs Xeon E5-4650 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1240P vs Xeon E5-4650 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1240P

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics, while Xeon E5-4650 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,224 vs 16,225).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4650 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4650 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-1240P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1240P better than Xeon E5-4650 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4650 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1240P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4650 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1240P is the better buy right now. Core i5-1240P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $309 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4650 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1240P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-1240P vs Xeon E5-4650 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1240P

The Core i5-1240P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,224 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4650 v4

The Xeon E5-4650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $3,838.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1240P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1240P versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v4 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-1240P (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-1240P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1240P scores 16,224 against the Xeon E5-4650 v4's 16,225 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-4650 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1240P vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-4650 v4.

Feature	Core i5-1240P	Xeon E5-4650 v4
Cores / Threads	12 / 16	14 / 28+17%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+57%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.2 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	35 MB+192%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	3.5 MB+180%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-P (2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	16,224	16,225
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,268	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,102	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,577	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1240P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1240P	Xeon E5-4650 v4
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1240P) / not specified (Xeon E5-4650 v4). The Core i5-1240P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1240P targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-1240P rivals Ryzen 5 6600U.