
Core i5-1240P

Core i7-10700F
Core i5-1240P vs Core i7-10700F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-1240P vs Core i7-10700F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-1240P vs Core i7-10700F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-1240P
2022Why buy it
- β Costs $1 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $310 MSRP).
- β Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- β 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics, while Core i7-10700F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,268 vs 12,000).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700F.
Core i7-10700F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Core i5-1240P.
Trade-offs
- β0.3% HIGHER MSRP$310 MSRPvs$309 MSRP
- β346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-1240P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700F better than Core i5-1240P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1240P vs Core i7-10700F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1240P
The Core i5-1240P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,224 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i7-10700F
The Core i7-10700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,139 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1240P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-10700F offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Core i5-1240P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1240P versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700F β a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700F (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-1240P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-10700F uses Comet Lake (2020β2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1240P scores 16,224 against the Core i7-10700F's 16,139 β a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-1240P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,268 vs 12,000 (6.3% advantage for the Core i7-10700F). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,102 vs 1,250, a 50.8% lead for the Core i5-1240P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,577 vs 7,800 (2.9% advantage for the Core i7-10700F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1240P vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700F.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Comet Lake (2020β2025) |
| PassMark | 16,224 | 16,139 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,268 | 12,000+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,102+68% | 1,250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,577 | 7,800+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1240P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-10700F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-1240P versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i7-10700F β the Core i5-1240P supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-10700F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-1240P) vs 16 (Core i7-10700F) β the Core i5-1240P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Alder Lake-P (Core i5-1240P) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,Z590 (Core i7-10700F).
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+64% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1240P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10700F). The Core i5-1240P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics), while the Core i7-10700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1240P targets Budget, Core i7-10700F targets Gaming/Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i5-1240P rivals Ryzen 5 6600U; Core i7-10700F rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming/Content Creation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-1240P was priced at $309, while the Core i7-10700F came in at $310. On launch pricing ($309 vs $310), Core i5-1240P was $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-1240P delivers 52.5 pts/$ vs 52.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-10700F β making the Core i5-1240P the 0.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309 | $310 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.5 | 52.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














