Xeon E-2336 vs Xeon E5-4650 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2336 vs Xeon E5-4650 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2336 vs Xeon E5-4650 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2336

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,136 vs 16,225).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).

Xeon E5-4650 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2336 better than Xeon E5-4650 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E-2336 is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4650 v4 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4650 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4650 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2336 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2336 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2336 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E-2336 vs Xeon E5-4650 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2336

The Xeon E-2336 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,136 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-4650 v4

The Xeon E5-4650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $3,838.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2336 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2336 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v4 — a 52.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2336 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E-2336 uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2336 scores 16,136 against the Xeon E5-4650 v4's 16,225 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-4650 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2336 vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-4650 v4.

Feature	Xeon E-2336	Xeon E5-4650 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 28+133%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+71%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+32%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	35 MB+192%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+14529%	3.5 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	16,136	16,225

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2336 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.