Core i7-10700F vs Xeon E-2336

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10700F vs Xeon E-2336 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10700F vs Xeon E-2336: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10700F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Xeon E-2336.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $310 MSRP, while Xeon E-2336 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Xeon E-2336

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,136 vs 16,139).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10700F better than Xeon E-2336?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2336 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-10700F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10700F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10700F is the better buy right now. Core i7-10700F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $310 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2336 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-10700F vs Xeon E-2336 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10700F

The Core i7-10700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,139 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2336

The Xeon E-2336 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,136 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-10700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2336 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2336 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-10700F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2336 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700F scores 16,139 against the Xeon E-2336's 16,136 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-10700F. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700F vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2336.

Feature	Core i7-10700F	Xeon E-2336
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+33%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	16,139	16,136
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i7-10700F	Xeon E-2336
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10700F) / not specified (Xeon E-2336). Primary use case: Core i7-10700F targets Gaming/Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700F rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.