
Core i7-10700F

Ryzen 7 1800X
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 1800X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 1800X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 1800X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-10700F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($310 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.1 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($310 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Ryzen 7 1800X.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,314 vs 12,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 52.1 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $310 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700F better than Ryzen 7 1800X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 1800X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10700F
The Core i7-10700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,139 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 1800X
The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-10700F and Ryzen 7 1800X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-10700F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700F scores 16,139 against the Ryzen 7 1800X's 16,305 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 1800X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,000 vs 9,314 (25.2% advantage for the Core i7-10700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,250 vs 1,130, a 10.1% lead for the Core i7-10700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,800 vs 5,700 (31.1% advantage for the Core i7-10700F). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700F vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X.
| Feature | Core i7-10700F | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+20% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16384 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 16,139 | 16,305+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,000+29% | 9,314 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250+11% | 1,130 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,800+37% | 5,700 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i7-10700F versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 7 1800X — the Core i7-10700F supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-10700F) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 1800X) — the Ryzen 7 1800X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,Z590 (Core i7-10700F) and AM4 (Ryzen 7 1800X).
| Feature | Core i7-10700F | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933+10% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 1800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10700F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X). Primary use case: Core i7-10700F targets Gaming/Content Creation, Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700F rivals Ryzen 5 5600X; Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.
| Feature | Core i7-10700F | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming/Content Creation | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-10700F was priced at $310, while the Ryzen 7 1800X came in at $499. On launch pricing ($310 vs $499), Core i7-10700F was $189 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10700F delivers 52.1 pts/$ vs 32.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 1800X — making the Core i7-10700F the 45.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-10700F | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $310-38% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.1+59% | 32.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













