
Core i7-10700F

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-10700F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,139 vs 16,245).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $310 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U better than Core i7-10700F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10700F
The Core i7-10700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,139 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,245 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-10700F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U uses Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700F scores 16,139 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U's 16,245 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-10700F | Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 16,139 | 16,245 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,800 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10700F | Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10700F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U). Primary use case: Core i7-10700F targets Gaming/Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700F rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i7-10700F | Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Content Creation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












