Core i7-10700F vs Xeon D-2733NT

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10700F vs Xeon D-2733NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10700F vs Xeon D-2733NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10700F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Xeon D-2733NT.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,139 vs 16,206).
❌Launch MSRP is still $310 MSRP, while Xeon D-2733NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.

Xeon D-2733NT

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-2733NT better than Core i7-10700F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-2733NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-10700F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2733NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-2733NT is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-10700F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon D-2733NT comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $310 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-10700F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 29.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-10700F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2733NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-10700F vs Xeon D-2733NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10700F

The Core i7-10700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,139 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2733NT

The Xeon D-2733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,206 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-10700F and Xeon D-2733NT share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700F versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-2733NT — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-10700F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700F scores 16,139 against the Xeon D-2733NT's 16,206 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon D-2733NT. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700F vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2733NT.

Feature	Core i7-10700F	Xeon D-2733NT
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+50%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+38%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+7%	15 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	16,139	16,206
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10700F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-10700F	Xeon D-2733NT
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10700F) / not specified (Xeon D-2733NT). Primary use case: Core i7-10700F targets Gaming/Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700F rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.