
Xeon E-2478
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6212U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E-2478
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 165W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $568 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6212U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6212U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2478 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,470 vs 27,776).
- ❌106.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 80W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2478 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon E-2478
2023Xeon Gold 6212U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 165W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $568 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6212U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2478 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,470 vs 27,776).
- ❌106.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 80W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2478 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2478 better than Xeon Gold 6212U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2478 | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2478 | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 616 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 522 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 467 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 154 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E-2478 | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E-2478 | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 694 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 694 FPS | 687 FPS |
| ultra | 652 FPS | 640 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 694 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 479 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2478 and Xeon Gold 6212U

Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478
The Xeon E-2478 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 27,776 points. Launch price was $568.

Xeon Gold 6212U
Xeon Gold 6212U
The Xeon Gold 6212U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,470 points. Launch price was $2,000.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2478 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6212U offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6212U has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2478 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6212U — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2478 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E-2478 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6212U uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2478 scores 27,776 against the Xeon Gold 6212U's 27,470 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E-2478. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2478 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6212U.
| Feature | Xeon E-2478 | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+33% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+17% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,776+1% | 27,470 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2478 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6212U uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2478 | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E-2478) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6212U). Primary use case: Xeon E-2478 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E-2478 | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













